So I've been thinking, Alot, about game theory as it applies to (potential) relationships. Mostly I rant about how ill-suited the social necessity of the conflation of coupling and sex applies to my existence, but today I'm going to do something a little different and consider things scientifically. What are the possibility vectors for a relationship for me?

A typical possibility vector would go like this:

1. I have a pool of friends
2. From said pool, I have a perceived compatability with each female
3. I estimate each person's compatability to me
4. Given some metric of my expectations versus estimated possibilities, I end up hooking up with one or more people from said group
5. Life happens, making vector members 1-4 irrelavent

However, the given, 1., does not apply: I don't have a pool of friends nor do I particularly have intentions of acquiring one. So given this baseline case, let's see what life holds for me. Shall we?

• apprentice: largely, my life hasn't been presented to anyone. This is caused mutually by my noncommunication of it and a lack of recptivity.
• mutual solace and bitterness
• mutual self recognition
• The caregiver: ive never had anyone that was willing to pick me up and help me solve my problems. Not surprising, really. I also dont know if it would work but it is a possibility

[...]

1. Lack of necessity of "doing" anything.

[...]

The cross product of all possibility vectors is the very large Hilbert space that describes the mutual affection of humanity for itself.