Mercurial > hg > CAPTCHAmiddleware
comparison README.txt @ 6:015875d43b91
update README
| author | k0s <k0scist@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| date | Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:29:22 -0500 |
| parents | 6c6766109dac |
| children | 8d826c3fbb06 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
| 5:6c6766109dac | 6:015875d43b91 |
|---|---|
| 19 computer is satisfied that you are you. But what if you want to make | 19 computer is satisfied that you are you. But what if you want to make |
| 20 an anonymous comment on someone's blog post? In a perfect world, | 20 an anonymous comment on someone's blog post? In a perfect world, |
| 21 there would be no CAPTCHAs. In the real world, there is SPAM. So if | 21 there would be no CAPTCHAs. In the real world, there is SPAM. So if |
| 22 I want to protect my blog from SPAM-bots, I need to do something. | 22 I want to protect my blog from SPAM-bots, I need to do something. |
| 23 Again, CAPTCHAs aren't perfect, but they're at least something. | 23 Again, CAPTCHAs aren't perfect, but they're at least something. |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 26 Why SkimpyGimpy? | |
| 27 ---------------- | |
| 28 | |
| 29 I used SkimpyGimpy because it is free, open souce, and has an easy to | |
| 30 use API. People complain that the CAPTCHAs are hard to read. I'm | |
| 31 sorry about that. If you really want to help, I'm sure the | |
| 32 SkimpyGimpy developers would be more than glad for a hand. | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 35 Why not reCAPTCHA? | |
| 36 ------------------ | |
| 37 | |
| 38 reCAPTCHA is annoying because it uses an API key and is not open | |
| 39 source. I have no idea why either of those things are true. If | |
| 40 someone wanted to help include reCAPTCHA support in this package, I'd be happy | |
| 41 to help. But because my opposition to closed source software (yes, | |
| 42 even if they are web services) and API keys, its not a priority for | |
| 43 me. | |
| 44 | |
| 45 | |
| 46 Why do this with middleware instead of in an app? | |
| 47 ------------------------------------------------- | |
| 48 | |
| 49 This is a long debate and the subject of many blog posts. In short, both | |
| 50 approaches are valid. If you want to integrated with application | |
| 51 logic, you shouldn't use middleware for something like this. If you | |
| 52 just want this functionality and don't care about tight integration, | |
| 53 then this approach might work for you. | |
| 54 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 Why does CAPTCHAauthmiddleware look half done? | |
| 57 ---------------------------------------------- | |
| 58 | |
| 59 Because it is. This is very much a work in progress. Its target | |
| 60 audience is clearly developers who want to get their hands dirty. So, | |
| 61 as per the usual disclaimer, sorry for the mess, am working on it. |